Modeling of seasonal leaf area index values in a tropical dry forest using high resolution satellite imagery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2018.2431666Keywords:
spectral data, dry season, vegetation indices, rain, texture metrics, kriging regressionAbstract
The leaf area index (LAI) provides information about the amount of photosynthetic area in relation to the total surface of an ecosystem and it is related to vital processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, and productivity. Thus, it is important to have information about the spatial distribution of LAI at the landscape level. One of the most used methods for estimating LAI from satellite images is to associate it with spectral characteristics of the image and vegetation indices. However, these indices have a strong limitation due to saturation problems, which reduces the possibility of generating accurate LAI maps, particularly in forests with high levels of biomass. Here, we obtained regression models to map LAI in a tropical dry forest of Yucatan, during the rainy and dry seasons from high resolution satellite imagery. We used regression analysis combined with kriging, as this procedure integrates the relationship between LAI and both spectral and texture information of the imagery, as well as the spatial dependence of the observations. LAI values were obtained in the field using hemispheric photographs. The results show that LAI values differ significantly between seasons, with mean values of 3.37 in the rainy season and 2.49 in the dry season. The R2adj values of the regression analysis were 0.58 and 0.63 for the rainy and dry season respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that by using texture measures, we are able to obtain accurate estimations of LAI in tropical dry forests with high levels of biomass.Downloads
References
Aguirre-Salado, C. A., Valdez-Lazalde, J. R., Ángeles-Pérez, G., de los Santos-Posadas, H. M., & Aguirre-Salado, A. I. (2011). Mapeo del índice de área foliar y cobertura arbórea mendiante fotografía hemisférica y datos SPOT 5 HRG: regresión y k-nn. Agrociencia, 45(1), 105-119.
Asner, G. P., Scurlock, J. M., & A Hicke, J. (2003). Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12(3), 191-205. doi 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00026.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00026.x
Beckschäfer, P., Seidel, D., Kleinn, C., & Xu, J. (2013). On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6(4), 228. doi: 10.3832/ifor0957-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0957-006
Beckschäfer, P., Fehrmann, L., Harrison, R. D., Xu, J., & Kleinn, C. (2014). Mapping Leaf Area Index in subtropical upland ecosystems using RapidEye imagery and the randomForest algorithm. IForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7(1), 1. doi 10.3832/ifor0968-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0968-006
Bréda, N. J. (2003). Ground‐based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(392), 2403-2417. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg263
Colombo, R., Bellingeri, D., Fasolini, D., & Marino, C. M. (2003). Retrieval of leaf area index in different vegetation types using high resolution satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(1), 120-131. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00094-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00094-4
Comisión Nacional Forestal [Conafor] (2010). Inventario Nacional Forestal y de Suelos, manual y procedimientos para el muestreo de campo. Remuestreo 2010. Zapopan, Jalisco, México: Conafor.
Comisión Nacional Forestal [Conafor] (2017). Proyecto de fortalecimiento REDD+ y cooperación Sur–Sur. Zapopan, Jalisco, México: Conafor. Recuperado de http://www.conafor.gob.mx/web/temas-forestales/bycc/acciones-de-preparacion-para-redd/proyecto-de-fortalecimiento-redd-y-cooperacion-sur-sur.
Chason, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D., & Huston, M. A. (1991). A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 57(1-3), 107-128. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90081-Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(91)90081-Z
Chen, J. M., & Cihlar, J. (1995). Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(3), 777-787. doi: 10.1109/36.387593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/36.387593
Dai, Z., Birdsey, R. A., Johnson, K. D., Dupuy, J. M., Hernandez-Stefanoni, J. L., & Richardson, K. (2014). Modeling carbon stocks in a secondary tropical dry forest in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 225(4), 1925. doi: 10.1007/s11270-014-1925-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-1925-x
Dale, M. R. T., & Fortin, M. J. (2002). Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests in ecology. Ecoscience, 9(2): 162-167. doi: 10.1080/11956860.2002.11682702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2002.11682702
Flores, J. S., & Espejel, I. C. (1994). Etnoflora Yucatense. No. 3. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Yucatán, México.
Frazer, G. W., Lertzman, K. P., & Trofymow, J. A. (1997). A method for estimating canopy openness, effective leaf area index, and photosynthetically active photon flux density using hemispherical photography and computerized image analysis techniques (Vol. 373). Victoria, BC: Pacific Forestry Centre.
Gao, X., Huete, A. R., Ni, W., & Miura, T. (2000). Optical–biophysical relationships of vegetation spectra without background contamination. Remote Sensing of Environment, 74(3), 609-620. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00150-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00150-4
Gao, Y., Giese, M., Brueck, H., Yang, H., & Li, Z. (2013). The relation of biomass production with leaf traits varied under different land-use and precipitation conditions in an Inner Mongolia steppe. Ecological Research, 28(6), 1029-1043. doi: 10.1007/s11284-013-1086-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-013-1086-1
Ghassemian, H. (2016). A review of remote sensing image fusion methods. Information Fusion, 32, 75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.03.003
Gower, S. T., Kucharik, C. J., & Norman, J. M. (1999). Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, f APAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(1), 29-51. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00056-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00056-5
Gray, J., & Song, C. (2012). Mapping leaf area index using spatial, spectral, and temporal information from multiple sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 119, 173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.12.016
GRASS Development Team, (2015). Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 7.0. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Recuperado de http://grass.osgeo.org
Haralick, R. M., & Shanmugam, K. (1973). Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (6), 610-621. doi 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
Hernández-Stefanoni, J. L., Gallardo-Cruz, J. A., Meave, J. A., & Dupuy, J. M. (2011). Combining geostatistical models and remotely sensed data to improve tropical tree richness mapping. Ecological Indicators, 11(5), 1046-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.11.003
Hernández‐Stefanoni, J. L., Johnson, K. D., Cook, B. D., Dupuy, J. M., Birdsey, R., Peduzzi, A., & Tun‐Dzul, F. (2015). Estimating species richness and biomass of tropical dry forests using LIDAR during leaf‐on and leaf‐off canopy conditions. Applied Vegetation Science, 18(4), 724-732., doi 10.1111/avsc.12190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12190
Jarlan, L., Balsamo, G., Lafont, S., Beljaars, A., Calvet, J. C., & Mougin, E. (2008). Analysis of leaf area index in the ECMWF land surface model and impact on latent heat and carbon fluxes: Application to West Africa. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D24). doi 10.1029/2007JD009370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009370
Jiang, Z., Huete, A. R., Didan, K., & Miura, T. (2008). Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(10), 3833-3845. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006
Jonckheere, I., Fleck, S., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., Coppin, P., Weiss, M., & Baret, F. (2004). Methods for leaf area index determination. Part I: Theories, techniques and instruments. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121, 19-35. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.027
Kalácska, M., Calvo-Alvarado, J. C., & Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A. (2005). Calibration and assessment of seasonal changes in leaf area index of a tropical dry forest in different stages of succession. Tree Physiology, 25(6), 733-744. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.6.733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.6.733
Kalacska, M., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Rivard, B., Caelli, T., White, H. P., & Calvo-Alvarado, J. C. (2007). Ecological fingerprinting of ecosystem succession: Estimating secondary tropical dry forest structure and diversity using imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108(1), 82-96. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.007
Kross, A., McNairn, H., Lapen, D., Sunohara, M., & Champagne, C. (2015). Assessment of RapidEye vegetation indices for estimation of leaf area index and biomass in corn and soybean crops. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 34, 235-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.002
Liu, Z., Chen, J. M., Jin, G., & Qi, Y. (2015). Estimating seasonal variations of leaf area index using litterfall collection and optical methods in four mixed evergreen–deciduous forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 209, 36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.04.025
Maass, J., Vose, J. M., Swank, W. T., & Martínez-Yrízar, A. (1995). Seasonal changes of leaf area index (LAI) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 74(1-3), 171-180. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)03485-F DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03485-F
Morisette, J. T., Baret, F., Privette, J. L., Myneni, R. B., Nickeson, J. E., Garrigues, S., & Kalacska, M. (2006). Validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products: A framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(7), 1804. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.872529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.872529
Nagendra, H. (2001). Using remote sensing to assess biodiversity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(12), 2377-2400. doi: 10.1080/01431160117096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160117096
Nafarrate-Hecht A. C. (2017). Estimación directa e indirecta del índice de área foliar (IAF) y su modelación con LiDAR en un bosque tropical seco de Yucatán. Tesis de maestría, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A. C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
Nobis, M., & Hunziker, U. (2005). Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 128(3), 243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.10.002
Pebesma, E. J., (2004). Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences 30, 683-691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012
Pfeffer, K., Pebesma, E. J., & Burrough, P. A. (2003). Mapping alpine vegetation using vegetation observations and topographic attributes. Landscape Ecology, 18(8), 759-776. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000014471.78787.d0
Pu, R., & Cheng, J. (2015). Mapping forest leaf area index using reflectance and textural information derived from WorldView-2 imagery in a mixed natural forest area in Florida, US. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 42, 11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2015.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.05.004
Quesada, M., Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Alvarez-Anorve, M., Stoner, K. E., Avila-Cabadilla, L., Calvo-Alvarado, J., & Gamon, J. (2009). Succession and management of tropical dry forests in the Americas: Review and new perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(6), 1014-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.023
Poorter, L., & Markesteijn, L. (2008). Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica, 40(3), 321-331. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00380.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00380.x
Rich, P. M. (1990). Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. Remote Sensing Reviews, 5(1), 13-29. doi: 10.1080/02757259009532119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259009532119
R Development Core Team (2012). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Recuperado de http://www.Rproject.org
Sasaki, T., Imanishi, J., Ioki, K., Song, Y., & Morimoto, Y. (2016). Estimation of leaf area index and gap fraction in two broad-leaved forests by using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 12(1), 117-127. doi 10.1007/s11355-013-0222-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-013-0222-y
Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A., Quesada, M., Rodríguez, J. P., Nassar, J. M., Stoner, K. E., Castillo, A., Garvin, T., Zent, E. L., Calvo-Alvarado, J. C., Kalacska, M. E.R., Fajardo, L., Gamon, J. A. y Cuevas-Reyes, P. (2005). Research priorities for neotropical dry forests. Biotropica, 37(4), 477-485. doi: 10.1046/j.0950-091x.2001.00153.x-i1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0950-091x.2001.00153.x-i1
Schleppi, P., Zingg, A., Manetti, M. C., Pelleri, F., Becagli, C., & Conedera, M. (2014). Use of hemispherical photography to quantify changes in leaf area index after thinning of chestnut coppices in Ticino, Switzerland. Document presented in 1st Coppice Conference COST action FP1301–Florence February 26 2014, Poster.
Schlerf, M., Atzberger, C., & Hill, J. (2005). Remote sensing of forest biophysical variables using HyMap imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 95(2), 177-194. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.016
Song, C. (2013). Optical remote sensing of forest leaf area index and biomass. Progress in Physical Geography, 37(1), 98-113. doi: 10.1177/0309133312471367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312471367
Thenkabail, P. S., Enclona, E. A., Ashton, M. S., Legg, C., & De Dieu, M. J. (2004). Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(1), 23-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.018
Tillack, A., Clasen, A., Kleinschmit, B., & Förster, M. (2014). Estimation of the seasonal leaf area index in an alluvial forest using high-resolution satellite-based vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 141, 52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.018
Weiss, M., Baret, F., Smith, G. J., Jonckheere, I., & Coppin, P. (2004). Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121(1), 37-53. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001
Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2001). Geostatistics for Environmental Science. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
Zhou, J. J., Zhao, Z., Zhao, J., Zhao, Q., Wang, F., & Wang, H. (2014). A comparison of three methods for estimating the LAI of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantations on the Loess Plateau, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(1), 171-188. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2013.866289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.866289
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract2367
-
PDF (Español)717
-
LENS (Español)47
Issue
Section
License
Madera y Bosques by Instituto de Ecología, A.C. is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribution-Non-Commercial-Share-alike 4.0 International.
