Size matters: the Juniperus deppeana Steud. (sabino) big fruits are more sensitive to insect depredation

Authors

  • Armando J. Martínez Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas
  • Pilar Sainos Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas
  • Ernesto Lezama Delgado Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas
  • Guillermo Angeles-Álvarez Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Departamento de Recursos Forestales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2007.1321229

Keywords:

Reproductive biology, fruit productivity, seed-predator insects, Juniperus deppeana, sabino

Abstract

The relationship between fruit size of Juniperus deppeana and damage caused by seed predator insects, in a forest fragment of Juniperus deppeana ( sabino), typical of the state of Tlaxcala, Mexico was analyzed. Female trees were selected to quantify fruit maturation. Their availability were classified into three categories: small (5 to 9 mm), medium (10-12 mm), and large (13 to 15 mm). At the same time, the amount and density of intact fruits and those presenting insect damage were quantified on five different samplings. Between 21-46 of the individuals presented fruits in 50 to 70% of the tree (by visual estimation). Also, categories of 5 to 30% of galbule abundance in the crowns were presented in 19 to 31 of the female individuals during the five different dates when the per cent quantifications were made. Female individuals produced fruits continuously from august 2004 to august 2005 . Although there was always a wide availability of large, medium, and small fruits, the first ones were the most damaged, since up to 30% of the fruits in that category presented exit holes caused by seedpredator insects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Armando J. Martínez,

Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas

Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana. Dr. Luis Castelazo s/n, Col. Industrial Ánimas, Km. 3.5 Carretera Federal Xalapa-Veracruz. Apartado Postal 320, Xalapa 91190 Veracruz, México

Pilar Sainos,

Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas

Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana. Dr. Luis Castelazo s/n, Col. Industrial Ánimas, Km. 3.5 Carretera Federal Xalapa-Veracruz. Apartado Postal 320, Xalapa 91190 Veracruz, México

Ernesto Lezama Delgado,

Universidad Veracruzana. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas

Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana. Dr. Luis Castelazo s/n, Col. Industrial Ánimas, Km. 3.5 Carretera Federal Xalapa-Veracruz. Apartado Postal 320, Xalapa 91190 Veracruz, México

Guillermo Angeles-Álvarez,

Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Departamento de Recursos Forestales

Instituto de Ecología, A.C. Departamento de Recursos Forestales, Km. 2.5 Antigua Carretera a Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91070 Veracruz, México

References

Arista, M. y S. Talavera. 1996. Density effect on the fruit-set, seed crop viability and seedling vigour of Abies pinsapo. Annals of Botany 77: 187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0021

Arista, M., P.L. Ortiz y S. Talavera. 1997. Reproductive isolation of two sympatric subspecies of Juniperus phoenicea (Cupressaceae) in southern Spain. Plant Systematics and Evolution 208: 225-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985443

Cibrián-Tovar, D., J.T. Méndez Montiel, R. Campos Bolaños, H.O. Yates y J. Flores Lara. 1995. Insectos forestales de México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Subsecretaría Forestal y Fauna Silvestre. United States Department of Agriculture.

Comisión Forestal de América del Norte. Publicación No. 6 Chapingo México. 453 p.

CONAFORA. 2003. Programa estratégico de desarrollo forestal del estado de Tlaxcala. 2025. Estudio básico de vegetación y usos del suelo. CONAFORA, Sociedad Anónima de Capital Variable.

Conover, W.J. y R.L. Iman. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician 35: 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1981.10479327

Farjon, A., C.N. Page y N. Schellevis. 1993. A preliminary world list of threatened conifer taxa. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 304-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056675

Fernández, G.W. y T.G. Whitham. 1989. Selective fruit abscission by Juniperus monosperma as an induced defense against predators. American Midland Naturalist 121(2): 389-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2426044

Fuentes, M. y E.W. Shupp. 1998. Empty seeds reduce seed predation by birds in Juniperus osteosperma. Evolutionary Ecology 12: 823-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006594532392

García, D., J.M. Gómez, R. Zamora y J.A. Hódar. 2000. Do empty Juniperus communis seeds defend filled seeds against predation by Apodemus sylvaticus? Ecoscience 7: 214-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2000.11682590

García, D.1998. Interaction between juniper Juniperus communis L. and its fruit pest insects: pest abundance, fruit characteristics and seed viability. Acta Oecologica 19 (6): 517-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80006-X

García, D., A.R. Zamora, J.M. Gómez y J.A. Hódar. 2002. Annual variability in reproduction of Juniperus communis L. in a Mediterranean mountain: Relationship to seed predation and weather. Ecoscience 9(2): 251-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2002.11682711

Göttsche, A.B. 1977. Verhalten von Megastigmus bipunctatus (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae) bei der Wirtsund Nahrungssuche. Entomologia Experimentalis et Aplicata 22: 90106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1977.tb02695.x

Guido, M. y A. Roques. 1996. Impact of the phytophagous insect and mite complex associated with cones of Junipers (Juniperus phoenicea L. and J. cedrus Webb and Berth.) in the Canary Islands. Ecología Mediterránea 22: l-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.1996.1797

Guido, M., A. Battisti y A.A. Roques.1995. Contribution to the study of cone and seed pest of the evergreen cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) in Italy. Redia 78: 21l-227.

Hedlin, A.F., H.O. Yates, III., D. CibriánTovar, B.H. Ebel, T.W. Koerber y E.P. Merkel. 1980. Cone and seed insects of North American conifers. Environment Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa; USDA Forest Service, Washington; Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos, México.

Herrera, C.M. 1982. Defense of ripe fruit from pests: its significance in relation to plant-disperser interactions. American Naturalist 120: 219-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/283984

Herrera, C.M. 1984. Selective pressures on fruit seediness: differential predation of fly larvae on the fruits of Berberis hispanica. Oikos 42: 166176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544789

Herrera, C.M. 1986. Vertebrate-dispersed plants: why they don’t behave the way they should. In: A. Estrada y T.H. Fleming, eds. Frugivores and seed dispersal. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht. pp: 5-l 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4812-9_2

INEGI. 1998. Los municipios de Tlaxcala. Monografía de Ixtacuixtla de Mariano Matamoros, Tlaxcala, México.

Janzen, D. H. 1969. Seed-eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23: 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03489.x

Janzen, D. H. 1971a. Seed predation by animals. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 2: 465-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002341

Janzen, D. H. 1971b. Scape of Cassia grandis L. beans from predators in time and space. Ecology 52: 964-979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1933802

Janzen, D.H. 1977. Why fruits rot, seeds mold, and meat spoils. American Naturalist 111:691-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/283200

Jordano, P. 1991. Gender variation and expression of monoecy in Juniperus phoenica (L.) (Cupressaceae). Botanical Gazette 152: 476-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/337909

Jordano, P., F. Pulido, J. Arroyo, J.L. García-Castaño y P. García-Fayos. 2004. Procesos de limitación demográfica. In: F. Valladares, ed. Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, EGRAF, S.A. Madrid. p: 229-248.

Knight, R.S. 1987. Doping with seed parasitism: a possible response by Protasparagus aethiopicus. Oikos 48: 15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3565682

Lezama, D.E. 2007. Dispersión espaciotemporal de semillas de Juniperus deppeana por el conejo montés Sylvilagus cunicularius en un fragmento de bosque de sabinos en Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala. Tesis Profesional. Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Facultad de Biología Agropecuaria, Tlaxcala, México.

Livingston, R.B. 1972. Influence of birds, stones and soil on the establishment of pasture juniper Juniperus communis, and red cedar, J. viginiana in New England pastures. Ecology 53: 1141-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1935427

Manzur, M.I y S.P. Courtney. 1984. Influence of insect damage in fruits of hawthorn on bird foraging and seed dispersal. Oikos 43: 265-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544142

Martínez, M. 1963. Las Pináceas Mexicanas. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 323 p.

Martínez, M. 1948. Las Pináceas de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. No. 1. Tomo XlX. Instituto de Biología, México. 107 p.

Oldfield, S., C. Lusty y A. Mackinven. 1998. The World List of Threatened Trees. World Conservation Press, Cambridge, Reino Unido. 650 p.

Ortega, M.J. 2000. Detección de hongos saprotrofos del bosque de Juniperus del municipio de Ixtacuixtla Tlaxcala. Inhibidores de crecimiento de hongos fitopatógenos. Tesis Profesional. Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala. Facultad de Biología Agropecuaria, Tlaxcala, México.

Ortiz, P.L., M. Arista y S. Talavera. 2002. Sex ratio and reproductive effort in the dioecious Juniperus comunes subsp. alpine (suter) Èelak. (Cupressaceae) along a altitudinal gradient. Annals of Botany 89: 2005-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf028

Owens, J.N., A.M. Colangeli y S.J. Morris. 1991. Factors affecting seed set in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 229-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-033

Powell, G.R. 1977. Initiation and development of subterminal buds in Abies balsamea. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7: 258-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x77-035

Queller, D. C. 1985. Proximate and ultimate causes of low fruit production in Asclepias exaltata. Oikos 44: 373-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3565777

Ramos, F.A., I. Martins, J.M. Farias, I.C.S. Silva, D.C. Costa y A.P. Miranda. 2001. Oviposition and predation by Speciomerus revoili ( Coleoptera, Bruchidae) on seeds of Acrocomia aculeata ( Arecaceae) in Brasilia, DF, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 3: 449-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842001000300014

Rappaport, N. y A. Roques. 1991. Resource use and clonal differences in attack rate by the Douglas-fir seed chalcid, Megastigmus spermotrophus Wachtl (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), in France. The Canadian Entomologist 123: 1219-1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1231219-6

Rappaport, N., S. Mori y A. Roques. 1993. Estimating effect of Megastigmus spermotrophus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) on Douglas-fir seed production: the new paradigm. Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 845-849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/86.3.845

Reyes, F.H. 2003. Estado del conocimiento de Juniperus deppeana Steud. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Tesis Profesional. 612 p.

Rzedowski, J. 1986. Vegetación de México, Limusa, México.

Sainos PP. 2007. Endozoocoria por el conejo montés Sylvilagus cunicularius y el cacomixtle Bassariscus astutus: atributos de gálbulos y semilla de Juniperus deppeana en Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala. Tesis de Licenciatura. Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Facultad de Biología Agropecuaria, Tlaxcala, México.

Salazar-Figueroa, R. 2001. Manejo de semillas de 75 especies forestales de América Latina. CATIE Volumen 2 , Serie 48. p : 23-24.

Sallabanks, R. y S.P. Courtney. 1992. Frugivory, seed predations, and insect-vertebrate interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 377-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.002113

Schupp, E.W., J.M. Gómez, J.E. Jiménez y M. Fuentes. 1997. Dispersal of Juniperus occidentalis (Western juniper) seeds by frugivorous mammals on Juniper Mountain, Southeastern Oregon. Great Bassin Naturalist 57: 74-78.

Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto. 1987. Clima. Carta del estado de Tlaxcala. Dirección General del Territorio Nacional. México.

SEMARNAP-UACH. 1999. Atlas Forestal de México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP). Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. México, DF.

Stephenson, A.G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001345

Traveset, A. y A. Sans. 1994. Insect frugivory in Juniperus phoenicea (L.) (Cupressaceae) in Cabrera island (Balearic Archipelago) Bulletin of Society History Natural Balears 37: 143-150.

Turgeon, J.J., C. Jones y M.I. Bellocq. 2004. Seed cone traits and insect damage in Tsuga canadensis (Pinaceae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 261-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-190

Valburg, L.K.1992a. Feeding preferences of common bush-tanagers for insectinfested fruits: avoidance or attraction? Oikos 65: 29-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544884

Valburg, L.K. 1992b. Eating infested fruits: interactions in a plant disperser-pest triad. Oikos 65: 25-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3544883

Vázquez-Yanes, C., A.I. Batis Muñoz, M.I. Alcocer Silva, M. Gual Díaz y C. Sánchez Dirzo. 2002. Árboles y arbustos nativos potencialmente valiosos para la restauración ecológica y la reforestación. Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

Vikberg, V. 1966. Observations on some finnish species of Megastigmus dalman ( Hym., Torymidae), including the biology of Megastigmus bipunctatus (Swederus). Annual Entomology Fennicia 32: 309-315.

Von Aderkas, P., G. Rouault, R. Wagner, R. Rohr y A. Roques. 2005. Seed parasitism redirects ovule development in Douglas fir. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272: 1491-1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3061

Willson, M.F. 1992. The ecology of seed dispersal. In: M. Fenner (ed.) Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities. C.A.B. International, Londres. p: 61-86.

Zanoni, T.A. y P.R. Adams. 1979. The genus Juniperus ( Cupressaceae) in Mexico and Guatemala: Synonymy key and distributions of the taxa. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 38: 83-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1171

Zar, J. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Martínez, A. J., Sainos, P., Lezama Delgado, E., & Angeles-Álvarez, G. (2016). Size matters: the Juniperus deppeana Steud. (sabino) big fruits are more sensitive to insect depredation. Madera Y Bosques, 13(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2007.1321229
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1341
  • PDF (Español)
    591

Issue

Section

Research papers

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)