Anatomía comparada de leño y corteza de Geoffroea striata y Geoffroea decorticans

Authors

  • Ana María Giménez Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Instituto de Silvicultura y Manejo de Bosques

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2004.1011279

Keywords:

Anatomy, bark, Geoffroea, wood

Abstract

Two are the arboreal species of the genus Geoffroea that vegetate in Argentina: Geoffroea striata Morong (manduvi-rá) and Geoffroea decorticans Burkart (chañar). Both have floristic importance, are used locally but their woods have no commercial value. The objectives of this work are: to describe the wood and bark anatomy of Geoffroea striata and contribute to their knowledge, to compare it anatomically with Geoffroea decorticans. The material was collected from natural forests of Isla del Cerrito Locality in Chaco (Chaco eastern district) and Los Flores, in Santiago del Estero ( Chaco western district). Five trees of each species were selected at random, obtaining a disc of 5 cm from the trunk at 1,3 m. In wood descriptions the IAWA Nomenclature was used. Bark descriptions were made according to standards of tissues distribution and the terminology of Roth. It may be Concluded that Geoffroea striata is a tree of great anatomical affinity with Geoffroea decorticans, being susceptible to have an alternative use of its wood. The variables present in the wood having meaningful differences are: vessel length, number of pores/mm2; fiber external and internal diameter, fiber wall thickness, as well as ray length. In bark, the principal differences reside in the external aspect. Both species present evolutionary characters in wood and bark.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ana María Giménez,

Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Instituto de Silvicultura y Manejo de Bosques

Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Instituto de Silvicultura y Manejo de Bosques. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales.Av. Belgrano (S) 1912 (4200) Santiago del Estero, Argentina

References

Berlyn, G. y J. Misksche. 1976. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Iowa State University, Ames, IOWA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2418781

Biloni, S.J. 1990. Árboles Autóctonos Argentinos. Tipográfica Editora Argentina. S.A. 333 p.

Burkart, A. 1952. Las leguminosas argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. Segunda Edición. Editorial ACME S.A.. Buenos Aires. 569 p.

Carlquist, S. 1988. Comparative wood anatomy. Systematic, Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects of Dicotyledon Woods. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Nueva York. 460 p.

Carlquist, S y D. Hoeckman. 1985. Ecological wood anatomy of the woody Southern California flora. IAWA Bull. N S (6):319-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000960

COPANT. 1973. Comisión Panamericana de Normas técnicas. (30):1-19.

Cozzo, D. y L. Cristiani. 1950. Los géneros de Fanerógamas argentinas con estructura leñosa estratificada. Rev Inst Nac Invest Cienc Nat Bot (1):1-6.

Gancedo, A. 1916. Flora Arbórea del Territorio Nacional del Chaco y Proyecto de Ley. Buenos Aires.

Giménez, A.1993. Rasgos estructurales característicos del leño secundario de las especies arbóreas de la región chaqueña seca. Rev. Quebracho (1):1-14.

Giménez, A. y J. Moglia. 2003. Árboles del Chaco Argentino- Guía para el reconocimiento dendrológico. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social de la Nación y Facultad de Ciencias Forestales- Universidad Nacional Santiago del Estero. Editorial El Liberal. 370 p.

Hess, R. 1946. Keys of American Woods XX. Woods with unilaterally paratracheal parenchyma. Trop woods (85):1-19.

IAWA Committee on Nomenclature. 1989. IAWA List of microscopy features for Hardwood Identification. 322 p.

Junikka, L. 1994. Survey of English macroscopic bark terminology. IAWA J. Vol 15(1) 3-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90001338

Miller, H. 1975. Anatomical characteristics of some woody plants of the Angmassalik district of Southeast Greenland. Medd. Groenl. 198(6): 1- 30.

Muñiz, G. y V. Coradin. 1991. Norma de procedimientos en estudios de anatomía da madeira. II Gimnospermae Comissae de estudios. CE: 11.01.07.002. ABNT. Brasilia: Laboratorio de Produtos Florestais, Serie Técnica. 117 p.

Record, S. 1944. Keys to American woods. XIV. Dicotyledonous woods with xylem rays virtually all uniseriate. Trop Wood (79): 15- 34.

Roth, I. 1981. Structural patterns of tropical barks. Encyclopedy of Plant Anatomy. 609 p.

Roth, I. y A. Giménez B. 1997. Argentine Chaco Forests. Dendrology, tree structure, and economic use. 1-The Semid-arid Chaco. Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy. Gerbruder Borntraeger. Berlin Stuttgart. 180 p.

Tortorelli, L. 1956. Maderas y bosques argentinos. Editorial ACME, SA. CI. Buenos Aires. 891 p.

Trockenbrodt, M. 1990. Survey and discussion of the terminology used in bark anatomy. IAWA Bull. n.s.11:141-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000511

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Giménez, A. M. (2016). Anatomía comparada de leño y corteza de Geoffroea striata y Geoffroea decorticans. Madera Y Bosques, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2004.1011279
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    1893
  • PDF (Español)
    488

Issue

Section

Research papers

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)