Dynamic modeling for diameter distribution on Pinus mixed stands in Durango, Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2015.212445Keywords:
diameter distribution, Weibull function, dynamic model, parameter prediction, recovery parametersAbstract
The characterization of the diameter distributions provides information on the structure of a stand and support in the planning of silvicultural treatments in forests with management. We estimated the parameters of location, scale and shape of the Weibull function to characterize the diameter distribution of species mixture of Pinus. We used 59 plots for model fitting (900 m2) and 100 temporary forest inventory plots for validation (1000 m2). The method of moments was better to estimate the parameters of the Weibull function as statistics used to measure the goodness of fit (lower mean absolute error, lower mean square error and fewer rejected plots with Kolmorogov-Smirnov test) compared with maximum likelihood and percentile methods. The prediction models of the parameters with stand variables represent a flexible and simple way to characterize and project the theoretical distribution of diameter classes easily and accurately. The kurtosis of the Weibull distribution has less peakedness with the projection of the number of trees in diameter classes, the shape of the curve tends to normalize and a slight positive skewness, while basal area in the form is more theoretical platykurtic distribution. The projection of the Weibull distribution can be used to determine forest management regimes or to regularize diameter structures in uneven-aged stands.
Downloads
References
Álvarez, J. G. y A. D. Ruiz. 1998. Análisis y modelización de las distribuciones diamétricas de Pinus pinaster Ait. In Galicia. Investigación Agraria. Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 7(1 y 2):123-137.
Amaro, A., D. Reed, M. Tome y I. Themido. 1998. Modeling dominant height growth: Eucalyptus plantations in Portugal. Forest Science 44(1):37-46.
Bailey, R. L. y T. R. Dell. 1973. Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. Forest Science 19(2):97-104.
Borders, B. E. y W. D. Patterson. 1990. Projecting stands tables: A comparison of the Weibull diameter distribution method, a Percentile-Based projection method, and a basal area growth projection method. Forest Science 36(2):413-424.
Cao, Q.V. 2004. Predicting parameters of Weibull function for modeling diameter distribution. Forest Science 50(5):682-685.
Cao, Q.V. 2012. Use of the Weibull function to predict future diameter distributions from current plot data. In: J.R. Butnor, J. R. ed. 2012. Proceedings of the 16th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-156. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. p:53-58.
Eerikäinen, K. y M. Maltamo. 2003. A percentile based basal area diameter distribution model for predicting the stand development of Pinus kesiya platations in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Forest Ecology and Management 172(1):109-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00443-7
Fidalgo, T., C. Pacheco y B. R. Parresol. 2009. Describing maritime pine diameter distribution with Jhonson’s SB distribution using a new all-parameter recovery approach. Forest Science 55(4):367-373.
García, C., N. Cañadas y G. Montero. 2002. Modelización de la distribución diamétrica de las masas de Pinus pinea L. de Valladolid (España) mediante la function Weibull. Investigación Agraria. Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 11(2):263-282.
Gorgoso, J.J., J.G. Álvarez, A. Rojo y J.A. Garandas-Arias. 2007. Modeling diameter distributions of Betula alba L. stands in northwest Spain with the two-parameter Weibull function. Investigación Agraria. Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 16(2):113-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/srf/2007162-01002
Hyink, D.M. y J.W. Moser. 1983. A generalized framework for projecting forest yield and stand structure using diameter distributions. Forest Science 29(1):85-95.
Kudus, K.A., M. I. Ahmad y J. Lopongan. 1999. Nonlinear regression approach to estimating Jhonson SB parameters for diameter data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29(3):310-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-197
Lei, Y. 2008. Evaluation of three methods for estimating the Weibull distribution parameters of Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis). Journal of Forest Science 54(12):566-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/68/2008-JFS
Liu, Ch., S.Y. Zhang, Y.Lei, P.F. Newton y L. Zhang. 2004. Evaluation of three methods for predicting diameter distributions of black spruce (Picea mariana) plantations in central Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34(12):2424-2432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-117
Maldonado, D. y J. Návar. 2002. Ajuste y predicción de la distribución Weibull a las estructuras diamétricas De plantaciones de pino de Durango, México. Madera y Bosques 8(1):61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2002.811306
Nanang, D.M. 1998. Suitability of the Normal, Log-normal and Weibull distributions for fitting diameter distributions of neem plantations in Northern Ghana. Forest Ecology and Management 103(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00155-2
Nord-Larsen, T. y Q.V. Cao. 2006. A diameter distribution model for even-aged beech in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 231(1-3):218-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.054
Reynolds, M.R., T.E. Burk y W. Huang. 1988. Goodness-of-fit test and model selection procedures for diameter distribution models. Forest Science 34(2):373-399.
SAS Institute Inc., 2011. SAS/ETS® 9.3 User´s Guide. Cary, NC:, SAS Institute Inc.
Shifley, S. y Lentz E. 1985. Quick estimation of the three parameters Weibull to describe tree size distributions. Forest Ecology and Management 13(3-4):195-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(85)90034-9
Shiver, B. D. 1988. Sample sizes and estimation methods for the Weibull distribution for unthinned Slash Pine plantation diameter distributions. Forest Science 34(3):809-814.
Torres-Rojo, J.M., O.S. Magaña-Torres, y M. Acosta-Mireles. 2000. Metodología para mejorar la predicción de parámetros de la distribuciónes diamétricas (Ensayo). Agrociencia 34(5):627-637.
Tsu, T.C., R.A. Mugele y F.A. McClintock. 1952. A discussion of “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability” by W. Weibull and S. Sweden. Journal of Applied Mechanics 19:233-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010469
Vallejos-Barra, O.S., D. Aedo-Ortiz, P.N. Izquierdo-Ossandon y M. Vázquez-Sandoval. 2009. Evaluación de procedimientos de ajuste óptimo de todos los parámetros de Weibull 3P para modelar la estructura horizontal en plantaciones de Pinus taeda. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 15(2):101-108.
Weibull, W. 1939. The phenomenon of rupture in solids. Proc. Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research (Ingeniorvetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar) 153:1-55
Weibull, W. y S. Sweden. 1951. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 73:293-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010337
Zanakis, S.H. 1979. A simulation study of some simple estimators for the three-parameters Weibull distribution. Journal of Statatistical Computation and Simulation 9(2):101-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00949657908810302
Zhang, L., J.H. Gove, Ch. Liu y W.B. Leak. 2001. A finite of two Weibull distributions for modeling the diameter distributions of rotated-sigmoid, uneven-aged stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31(9):1654-1659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-086
Zhang, L., K.C. Packard and Ch. Liu. 2003. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Jhonson’s SB distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33(7):1340-1347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-054
Zarnoch, S.J. y T.R. Dell. 1985. An evaluation of percentile and maximum likelihood estimator of Weibull parameter. Forest Science 31(1):260-268.
Published
How to Cite
-
Abstract2185
-
PDF (Español)518
-
HTML (Español)471
Issue
Section
License
Madera y Bosques by Instituto de Ecología, A.C. is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribution-Non-Commercial-Share-alike 4.0 International.
